Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BENEDICT RAYMOND,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.

The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed defendant's conviction for debauching a child in violation of N.J.S. 2A:96-3. State v. Raymond, 74 N.J. Super. 434 (1962). Asserting a constitutional issue, defendant undertook to appeal to us as of right under R.R. 1:2-1(a).

The single claim on this appeal is that the trial court improperly denied a motion to adjourn the trial date. Before us the complaint is for the first time cast in constitutional garb, i.e., deprivation of the right to counsel. The attack upon the trial court's ruling is without basis, and the effort to generate a "constitutional" question is frivolous.

The appeal is dismissed.

For dismissal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

Opposed — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. RAYMOND
(Feb 18, 1963)