ESSO STANDARD OIL CO. v. HOLDERMAN, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. John W. Fritz and Mr. Edward B. Meredith argued the cause for the appellants ( Messrs. Wharton, Stewart Davis, attorneys). Mr. Theodore I. Botter argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. John W. Fritz and Mr. Edward B. Meredith argued the cause for the appellants ( Messrs. Wharton, Stewart Davis, attorneys). Mr. Theodore I. Botter argued the cause for the respondent ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

ESSO STANDARD OIL COMPANY ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, v. CARL HOLDERMAN,COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY,DEFENDANT.NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Conford in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.