REALTY SALES CORP. v. PAYNE, N.J. Super. App. Div., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Andrew Mainardi, Jr. argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Mainardi Mainardi, attorneys). Mr. Saul A. Wittes argued the cause for respondent.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

REALTY SALES CORPORATION, A BODY CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DANIEL PAYNE, SINGLE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND THE TAX INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, A BODY CORPORATE OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. THE TAX INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

PER CURIAM.

The judgment will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Collester in the Chancery Division. 76 N.J. Super. 59 ( Ch. Div. 1962). Appellant seeks to overcome the force of the opinion of the Court of Errors and Appeals in Absecon Land Co. v. Keernes, 101 N.J. Eq. 227 ( E. A. 1927), which is squarely contrary to its position, on the ground that the facts in that case, not reflected in the opinion of the court, indicate the ruling on the issue here in question to have been dictum. The argument does not impress us. The court undertook to decide the point, and we should respect its construction of the statute until the court of last resort decides otherwise.

Affirmed.

REALTY SALES CORP. v. PAYNE

Comments