Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LILLIAN SADOWSKY AND SIDNEY SADOWSKY, PETITIONERS, v. BENJAMIN LEVINE AND ANNA LEVINE, RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged, 135 So.2d 776.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, Acting C.J., THOMAS, CALDWELL, HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur.

DREW and O'CONNELL, JJ., dissent.

DREW, Justice (dissenting).

I would grant certiorari and quash the decision of the district court for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge PEARSON, TILLMAN.

O'CONNELL, J., concurs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SADOWSKY v. LEVINE
(Apr 2, 1963)