Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

MILTON E. SPATT, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. There was sufficient basis for classification in the different tax treatment of trade-in automobiles in transactions taking place outside the City of New York by reason of the greater cost of enforcing the compensating use tax and the greater likelihood of resale of the used car within the City of New York. We pass upon no other question. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SPATT v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(May 2, 1963)