Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

JAMES MONTALBANO et al., Respondents, v. ORILLO DE LUZIO et al., Appellants

Per Curiam.

The determination of the City Rent and Rehabilitation Administration, based upon a physical inspection, as to the number of rooms occupied by the tenants was binding upon the trial court. (City Rent, Eviction and Rehabilitation Regulations, § 36, subd. a; Barbee v. 2639 Corp., 284 App. Div. 298; Serxner v. Elgart, 196 Misc. 1053, 1056.) The maximum rent could be increased only by order of the Administrator and not the court. ( Seidenberg v. Cavanagh, 204 Misc. 235; Ivanovsky v. Paladino, 115 N.Y.S.2d 596; Friedman v. Carr, 115 N.Y.S.2d 519.) The method prescribed in section 8 of the Local Emergency Housing Rent Control Act (L. 1962, ch. 21, § 1, subd. 8) for the judicial review of an order of the city rent agency is exclusive.

The final order should be unanimously modified by reducing the amount of landlords' recovery for rent to $276, with appropriate costs in the court below, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs of this appeal. Warrant stayed until 10 days after service of a copy of the order hereon with notice of entry.

Concur — HART, BROWN and BENJAMIN, JJ.

Final order modified, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MONTALBANO v. LUZIO
(May 23, 1963)