Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Dan DUNCAN v. STATE of Alabama.

SIMPSON, Justice.

This petition is without merit. No application for rehearing was made in the Court of Appeals. The rule is:

"This court will not * * * receive or consider an application for the writ of certiorari * * * for the purpose of reviewing or revising any opinion or decision of the court of appeals, * * *, unless it appears upon the face of the application therefor that application has been made to said court of appeals for a rehearing of the point or decision complained of, and that said application had been decided adversely to the movant, and the application to this court must be filed with the clerk of this court within fifteen days after the action of said court of appeals upon the said application for rehearing. * * *." Supreme Court Rule 39, Title 7, Code of Ala. 1940, as amended.

Compliance with this rule is jurisdictional. Reserve Life Ins. Co. v. Longshore, 262 Ala. 95, 77 So.2d 392; Johnson v. State, 261 Ala. 373, 74 So.2d 508; Dawson v. State, 259 Ala. 205, 66 So.2d 568; Oliver v. State, 256 Ala. 295, 54 So.2d 618.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and MERRILL and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DUNCAN v. STATE
(May 30, 1963)