BINGHAM v. DEPT. OF CIVIL SERVICE, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Max A. Boxer argued the cause for
Mr. William L. Boyan argued the cause for respondent, Department of Civil Service ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney). Mr. Martin Klughaupt argued the cause for respondents, Hymen Siegendorf
Sidney

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Max A. Boxer argued the cause for
Mr. William L. Boyan argued the cause for respondent, Department of Civil Service ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General, attorney). Mr. Martin Klughaupt argued the cause for respondents, Hymen Siegendorf
Sidney

See more information ...

Smart Summary

JAMES J. BINGHAM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE OF THESTATE OF NEW JERSEY, HYMEN SIEGENDORF AND SIDNEY ZISLIN,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Gaulkin in the Appellate Division, 77 N.J. Super. 459.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.