AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

SEYMOUR HOROWITZ, Respondent, v. B S CATERERS, INC., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. HARRY LAZAR, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injury sustained by plaintiff, who was a guest at a Bar Mitzvah party given by the third-party defendant and catered by the defendant and third-party plaintiff upon premises controlled by it, when plaintiff allegedly fell on the highly polished waxed floor upon which there was an accumulation of wax, the said defendant and third-party plaintiff appeals: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 23, 1962, which granted the third-party defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint; and (2) from the judgment entered July 10, 1962 on said order, dismissing the third-party complaint. Order and judgment reversed, without costs, and motion denied. In our opinion, under all the circumstances presented by this record, triable issues of fact exist. We pass on no other questions raised by the parties on this appeal. Beldock, P.J., Ughetta, Brennan, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [ 35 Misc.2d 283. ]

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOROWITZ v. B S CATERERS, INC
(Jun 24, 1963)