Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of JOHN LAMULA, Appellant, v. JAMES M. POWER et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and JOSEPH MURPHY et al., Respondents.

Order reversed and the prayer of the petition granted, without costs. We hold that there was no substantial violation of the requirement of section 135 of the Election Law that the pages of such a petition be "numbered consecutively". We hold, also, that, under all the circumstances, the objectors were properly before the court. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, FOSTER and SCILEPPI.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF LAMULA v. POWER
(Aug 30, 1963)