EBERHARDT, Judge.
Excepting to a judgment overruling his amended motion for new trial, plaintiff in error has abandoned the general grounds, but insists upon the special grounds all of which complain of the failure of the court to charge certain principles of law. In none of them is set forth the pleadings or the evidence supporting the charges which it is contended the court should have given, nor is there pointed out where in the record these are to be found. Thus no question is presented for decision. Hardwick v. Georgia Power Co., 100 Ga. App. 38 (5) ( 110 S.E.2d 24); Hodges v. Gay, 100 Ga. App. 210 ( 110 S.E.2d 570); Beecher v. Farley, 104 Ga. App. 785 ( 123 S.E.2d 184); Pendry v. Addison, 105 Ga. App. 673 (1) ( 125 S.E.2d 523); Byck v. Lawton, 218 Ga. 858 (4) ( 131 S.E.2d 176). Accordingly, the judgment must be
Affirmed. Felton, C. J., and Russell, J., concur.
DECIDED SEPTEMBER 13, 1963.