AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of JACOB STEINBERG, Deceased. ABRAHAM STEINBERG, Appellant; JULIA STEINBERG et al., Respondents.

Order, entered on February 18, 1963, unanimously modified on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, to deny the motion of contestants-respondents insofar as they sought to modify items (a) and (c) of the demand for bill of particulars. Said items of the demand should have been allowed to stand. The order provides that the bill of particulars shall be served following the completion of the examinations before trial; and the contestants should then be able to and be required to state the times when and the places where the acts constituting the alleged fraud and undue influence took place, and also the names of the person or persons alleged to have exercised or practiced the same. (See Matter of Martin, 151 Misc. 93; Matter of Gordon, 6 N.Y.S.2d 569, 570.)

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF STEINBERG
(Sep 26, 1963)