Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HUTCHINSON v. PERLIS et al.

CANDLER, Justice.

This litigation involves the same parties and the same question which was decided favorably to the contention of the plaintiff in error in I. Perlis Sons v. National Surety Corp., 218 Ga. 667 ( 129 S.E.2d 915); and since the amendments to the pleadings which have been subsequently allowed set out no facts which would now require a ruling different from the one there made, our previous ruling fixed the law of the case and is controlling. Hence the judgment here complained of — a judgment refusing to make the nonresident respondents parties to the case — is not erroneous.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 10, 1963 — DECIDED OCTOBER 10, 1963.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HUTCHINSON v. PERLIS
(Oct 10, 1963)