Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

EDWARDS ET AL. v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF SCIOTO COUNTY ET AL.

Prohibition — Writ denied, when — Remedy available in ordinary course of law — Criminal law — Validity of indictment questioned.

Per Curiam.

Relators are afforded an adequate remedy by way of appeal. This court will ordinarily, in the exercise of its discretion, deny a writ of prohibition where relator has an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State, ex rel. Masterson, v. Ohio State Racing Comm., 164 Ohio St. 312, 316. See State, ex rel. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., v. Industrial Commission, 162 Ohio St. 302.

The demurrer to the petition is sustained and a writ of prohibition denied.

Writ denied.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, GRIFFITH, HERBERT and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EDWARDS v. COURT
(Oct 23, 1963)