N.J. BELL TEL. CO. v. BD. OF REVIEW, DIV. OF EMP. SEC'Y, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Michael J. O'Neil argued the cause for the
Mr. Sidney Reitman argued the cause for the respondent, Esther W. Rowe (
Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter Reitman, attorneys). Mr. Edward A. Kaplan argued the cause for the respondent, Board of
Lum, Biunno Tompkins filed a brief amicus curiae ( Mr. Vincent P. Biunno, of counsel).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Michael J. O'Neil argued the cause for the
Mr. Sidney Reitman argued the cause for the respondent, Esther W. Rowe (
Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter Reitman, attorneys). Mr. Edward A. Kaplan argued the cause for the respondent, Board of
Lum, Biunno Tompkins filed a brief amicus curiae ( Mr. Vincent P. Biunno, of counsel).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY,PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REVIEW, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY,DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND MRS. ESTHER W.ROWE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.