Unemployment Compensation — Voluntary termination of employment — Domestic reasons — Necessity for caring for child — Unemployment Compensation Law.
In this case, in which it appeared that claimant quit her full time employment because her baby sitter had left and she had no one to care for her five year old child, it was Held that the compensation authorities properly concluded that claimant had voluntarily terminated her employment because of domestic reasons, and that she was disqualified from receiving benefits under § 402(b)(2) of the Unemployment Compensation Law.
Argued November 12, 1963.
OPINION BY ERVIN, J., December 12, 1963:
In this unemployment compensation case the bureau, referee and the board all concluded that the appellant voluntarily terminated her employment because of domestic reasons and that she was disqualified from receiving benefits under the provisions of § 402(b)(2) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, 43 P. S. § 802(b)(2).
Claimant quit her full-time employment because her baby sitter left and she had no one to care for her five-year old child. This case is ruled by Dawkins Unemployment Compensation Case, 197 Pa. Super. 427, 178 A.2d 775; and Domico Unemployment Compensation Case, 198 Pa. Super. 327, 181 A.2d 731.
OPINION BY ERVIN, J., December 12, 1963:
Decision affirmed.