Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE STATE EX REL., RUGGIERO v. COMMON PLEAS COURT OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY ET AL.

Precedendo — Remedy not available where adequate remedy by appeal — Board of Zoning Appeals — Appeal to Common Pleas Court — Remand to board for specific finding of facts and final order — Appeal from order of court available.

Per Curiam.

Section 2506.04, Revised Code, a section of the chapter on appeals from orders of administrative agencies, provides:

"The court may find that the order * * * is unconstitutional * * * unreasonable, or unsupported by the preponderance of * * * evidence * * *. Consistent with its findings, the court may affirm, reverse, vacate, or modify the order * * * or remand the cause to the officer or body appealed from with instructions to enter an order consistent with the findings or opinion of the court. The judgment of the court may be appealed by any party on questions of law pursuant to Sections 2505.01 to 2505.45, inclusive, of the Revised Code."

If, as relator contends, the court could not render the judgment which it proposes to render, the relator is afforded an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law by way of appeal from that judgment.

The demurrer to the petition is sustained, and a writ of procedendo is denied.

Writ denied.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, GRIFFITH, HERBERT and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE EX REL. v. COURT
(Dec 18, 1963)