Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

HOWARD MORRIS, EDWARD MORRIS AND ROSE MORRIS, PARTNERS, TRADING AS CARICKREALTY CO., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NICHOLAS W. POSTMA, BUILDING INSPECTOROF THE BOROUGH OF FAIR LAWN, AND THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF FAIRLAWN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.HOWARD MORRIS, EDWARD MORRIS AND ROSE MORRIS, PARTNERS, TRADING AS CARICKREALTY, CO., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — Justice HALL — 1.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MORRIS v. POSTMA
(Jan 20, 1964)