AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MASSEY-FERGUSON LIMITED, a corporation, Appellant, v. INTERMOUNTAIN FORD TRACTOR SALES COMPANY, a corporation, Cassia Equipment Co., a corporation, Elliotts Inc., a corporation, Chisholm Brothers Farm Equipment Co., a corporation and Charles W. Bullen, doing business as Bullen Farm Equipment Company, Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The question presented on this interlocutory appeal in an antitrust suit is whether the appellant Canadian corporation was, as the trial Court held, transacting business and found within the District of Utah, so as to be amenable to venue and process in that District, under Section 12 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 738, 15 U.S.C. § 22.

We agree with the trial Court that by reason of its interlocking and integrated control of "North American Operations," the appellant Canadian corporation was enabled to and did direct "the detailed activities of the American corporation, including the operation of company stores in both Utah and Idaho; * *" and that it was, therefore, transacting business and found through its subsidiary within the District. Intermountain Ford Tractor Sales Company, a corporation et al. v. Massey-Ferguson Limited, a corporation et al., D.C., 210 F. Supp. 930, 939.

The judgment of the trial Court is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MASSEY-FERGUSON v. INTERMOUNTAIN FORD T. S
(Jan 24, 1964)