AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of the Claim of HARRY LAPINSKY, Deceased, Respondent, v. ARDOM BAKE SHOP, INC., et al., Appellants. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION BOARD, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs to respondent Workmen's Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, BURKE and SCILEPPI. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that it is barred, as matter of law, by section 40 of the Workmen's Compensation Law. Taking no part: Judge BERGAN.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF LAPINSKY v. ARDOM BAKE SHOP
(Jan 23, 1964)