Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Joseph Lynch for appellant-respondent in the first, second and third above-entitled actions and appellant in the fourth and fifth above-entitled actions. Jay M. Friedman for respondents-appellants in the first, second and third above-entitled actions and for respondents in the fourth and fifth above-entitled actions.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Joseph Lynch for appellant-respondent in the first, second and third above-entitled actions and appellant in the fourth and fifth above-entitled actions. Jay M. Friedman for respondents-appellants in the first, second and third above-entitled actions and for respondents in the fourth and fifth above-entitled actions.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

GEORGE D. DEL VECCHIO, Respondent-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF CAYUGA, Appellant-Respondent. JOAN M. DEL VECCHIO, Respondent-Appellant,

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN. Judge VAN VOORHIS dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the claim upon the ground that no negligence has been established against the County of Cayuga as matter of law.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

DEL VECCHIO v. COUNTY OF CAYUGA
(Feb 20, 1964)