Automobiles 43 — The vehicle of the additional defendants was parked without lights on the highway and was struck by the original defendant's vehicle, causing the additional defendants' vehicle to strike plaintiff pedestrian, held, the evidence of the additional defendants' concurring negligence was properly submitted to the jury on the cross action of the original defendant.
PER CURIAM.
The pleadings of all parties were direct and concise. They presented clear-cut issues of fact. The evidence consisted of the testimony of the plaintiff, the original defendant, and the investigating officer. The controversy in this Court, however, involves only the fourth issue — the original defendant's claim for contribution against the additional defendants. The evidence was ample to sustain the jury's findings.
No error.