Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

IRENE E. ROTTMANN, Plaintiff, v. HERMAN STEGEMANN et al., Defendants

BERNARD S. MEYER, J.

This motion to strike the action from the calendar is granted and the action is stricken from the calendar. Plaintiff errs in his construction of the Special Rule Requiring Physical Examination and Exchange of Medical Information (Rules of Appellate Division, 2d Dept., part 4). Rule VI of part 4 provides that "No cause otherwise eligible to be noticed for trial may be noticed unless there has been compliance with this part, or an order dispensing with compliance". While it is true that defendant may demand a physical examination under rule I of that part, he is not obligated to. Plaintiff also may initiate physical examination procedure and until one of the parties has may not notice the case for trial.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROTTMANN v. STEGEMANN
(Apr 1, 1964)