Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE STATE EX REL. SCHWARTZ v. BROWN, SECY. OF STATE.

Elections — Mandamus to require certification of candidate's name — Dilatoriness in prosecuting action — Dismissal sua sponte.

Per Curiam.

Our statutes (1) provide that the Secretary of State "shall * * * certify to each board" of elections on the 75th day before the primary election (here February 20) the names of the state candidates to be printed on the ballots (Section 3513.05, Revised Code) and (2) contemplate that armed-service and absentee ballots for this primary should have been available by March 6, 1964 (Sections 3511.03 and 3509.03, Revised Code). Under the circumstances here, where time is such an important factor, extreme diligence and the promptest of action were required on the part of relator. The unexplained lack of diligence on the part of relator deprives him of the relief he seeks. State, ex rel. Winterfeld, v. Board of Elections of Lucas County, 167 Ohio St. 531; State, ex rel. Peirce, v. Board of Elections of Stark County, 168 Ohio St. 249.

The case is dismissed sua sponte. Case dismissed.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, GRIFFITH, HERBERT and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE EX REL. v. BROWN
(Apr 9, 1964)