Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANK SCALEGNIO, Appellant.

Order of Appellate Term reversed and motion to suppress granted (see People v. Caliente, 12 N.Y.2d 89).

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.

Judge DYE dissents and votes to affirm in the following memorandum:

When we take into consideration that, shortly before the officer lawfully stopped defendant's automobile for a traffic violation, he had observed defendant make contact with a known drug pusher under suspicious circumstances, it was not unreasonable for the officer to believe that defendant was committing the crime of possession of narcotics in his presence. This being so, probable cause existed for the arrest of defendant without a warrant and the officer was justified in seizing what appeared to be a package of marijuana lying in plain sight in the automobile.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SCALEGNIO
(May 7, 1964)