Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

VIOLA C. LEONARD v. BAKER'S SHOE STORE, INC., AND NORTH CAROLINA FURNITURE, INC.

Negligence 37f — Evidence tending to show that the seat of the chair in which plaintiff was sitting tilted forward, causing plaintiff to fall to the floor of defendant's store, that the seat of the chair tilted because two screws holding the seat at its rear were broken, that the heads of the screws were still countersunk after the accident, and that when plaintiff sat down the seat of the chair was apparently in good condition, without evidence that an inspection would have revealed any defect, is held insufficient to overrule nonsuit.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant insists that on authority of Schueler v. Good Friend Corp., 231 N.C. 416, 57 S.E.2d 324, 21 A.L.R.2d 417, she is entitled to a reversal of the judgment as of nonsuit entered below.

In the Schueler case the entire tier of chairs turned over backwards when the plaintiff sat down and turned to place her purse in an adjoining chair. Moreover, there was evidence that the chairs had been fastened to the floor when the plaintiff had previously visited the store with one of her children about a week earlier. There also was evidence tending to show that the chairs were top-heavy and unbalanced and were not safe unless fastened to the floor.

In the instant case, there is no evidence tending to show that an inspection by the defendant would have revealed any defect or weakness in the chair involved.

We hold that plaintiff failed to establish actionable negligence on the part of the defendant.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEONARD v. SHOE STORE
(May 1, 1964)