Attorneys at law — Misconduct — Disciplinary action — Evidence insufficient to warrant.
Per Curiam.
From a careful consideration of the report of the board, the respondent's objections thereto, and the testimony and exhibits, this court is of the opinion that the evidence is insufficient to justify disciplinary action.
The objections to the report are sustained, and judgment is rendered dismissing the proceedings against the respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, GRIFFITH, HERBERT and GIBSON, JJ., concur.