Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Blatt Appeal.

Elections — Absentee ballots — Challenge — Sufficiency — Practice — Election Code.

1. A challenge to an absentee ballot which gives as the basis therefor one of the grounds enumerated in the Election Code of 1937, P. L. 1333, § 1308, as amended, and is substantially in the language thereof, is sufficient to require that a hearing be held thereon in conformity with that section of the code. [450]

2. There is no requirement in the Election Code that a challenge to an absentee ballot be supported, at the time of challenge or prior to hearing, by an affidavit or memorandum. [450]

Mr. Justice MUSMANNO and Mr. Justice COHEN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

OPINION PER CURIAM, May 27, 1964:

We are all of the opinion that a challenge to an absentee ballot which gives as the basis therefor one of the grounds enumerated in § 1308 of the Pennsylvania Election Code, June 3, 1937, P. L. 1333, added, March 6, 1951, P. L. 3, § 11, as amended, August 13, 1963, P. L. 707, § 24, 25 P. S. § 3146.8 (Supp. 1963), and is substantially in the language thereof, is sufficient to require that a hearing be held thereon in conformity with that section of the Code. There is no requirement in the Election Code that a challenge to an absentee ballot be supported, at the time of challenge or prior to hearing, by an affidavit or memorandum. Furthermore, this record discloses a sufficient and adequate challenge under the law to require a hearing by the Board of Elections on the validity of the challenged ballots.

The order below is reversed and the County Board of Elections is directed to hold a hearing on each challenged absentee ballot in conformity with the provisions of § 1308 of the Election Code, as amended.

Mr. Justice MUSMANNO and Mr. Justice COHEN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BLATT APPEAL
(May 27, 1964)