Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In re Bernard Woodmansee

Habeas Corpus.

1. Where a prisoner is in confinement, on sentence after conviction, he is "in execution" within the meaning of Section 32, Chapter II of the Vermont Constitution, the offense for which he is confined is not bailable as a matter of right.

Per Curiam.

The petitioner, Bernard Woodmansee, seeks release from the Vermont State Prison at Windsor by habeas corpus. It appears from the petition that the prisoner's confinement was ordered by a mittimus, issued by the Chittenden County Court upon his conviction and sentence after trial by jury for the offenses of burglary and attempted arson. He contends he is entitled to be admitted to bail pending final disposition of his appeal from these convictions.

Since it appears that the petitioner is "in execution" within the meaning of Section 32, Chapter II of the Vermont Constitution, the offense for which he is confined is not bailable, as a matter of right, at this stage of the proceedings. In re Comolli, 78 Vt. 337, 343, 63 A. 184. This disposition is also in accord with the unreported case In re Rickert, No. 1984, filed June 4, 1964.

It is ordered that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE WOODMANSEE
(Jun 15, 1964)