Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

KAZIMIERZ TEBIN, Respondent, et al., Plaintiffs, v. JANINA MOLDOCK, Appellant.

Judgment modified in the following memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The judgment should be modified to limit the scope of the constructive trust imposed on defendant Janina Moldock to an obligation to pay $25 a month for the benefit of Kazimierz Tebin, and the action remitted to Special Term for appropriate directions in the implementation of such obligation and, as thus modified, affirmed, without costs. On reviewing the differences between the Appellate Division and Special Term on appraisal of the facts, we conclude the record supports a finding that defendant, occupying a relationship of confidence and trust with decedent, undertook to devote a small part of the property given to her for the benefit of plaintiff. On the basis of defendant's own testimony this would approximate $25 a month. No such breach of confidence or of fiduciary obligation, either before or after decedent's death, has been established as would warrant forfeiture by defendant of the major interest in decedent's property which it was clearly decedent's intent that defendant should have.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TEBIN v. MOLDOCK
(Jun 4, 1964)