Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROLLINS v. HASKINS, SUPT., LONDON CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION.

Habeas corpus — Not available, when — Petitioner not entitled to immediate relief — Where subject to detention under earlier conviction — Issues available on appeal.

Per Curiam.

Petitioner in this action in habeas corpus is attacking only his 1962 conviction. Petitioner is still subject to detention under his 1957 conviction. Habeas corpus lies only if the petitioner is entitled to immediate release upon the determination that the claim urged in the action is well founded. Petitioner, in the present case, would not be entitled to immediate release inasmuch as he is still subject to detention on his 1957 conviction. Thus, habeas corpus does not lie. Page v. Green, Supt., 174 Ohio St. 178; and McNally v. Hill, 293 U.S. 131. Errors which petitioner wishes to urge in relation to his 1962 conviction under such circumstances must be raised by appeal.

Petitioner remanded to custody.

TAFT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, GRIFFITH, HERBERT and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROLLINS v. HASKINS, SUPT., L.C.I
(Jun 24, 1964)