COFFEE-RICH, INC. v. McDOWELL, Wis., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the appellant the cause was argued by James H. McDermott, assistant attorney general, and Frederick J. Griffith, attorney for the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, with whom on the briefs were George Thompson, attorney general, and Gerhardt A. Schueler, attorney for the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture. For the respondent there was a brief by T. L. Tolan, Jr., Samuel J. Recht, and Brady, Tyrrell Bruce, all of Milwaukee, attorneys, and Ellis Arnall, Elliott H. Levitas, and Arnall, Golden Gregory, all of Atlanta, Georgia, of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Tolan, Mr. Ellis Arnall, and Mr. Levitas.

Judges

PER CURIAM:

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

For the appellant the cause was argued by James H. McDermott, assistant attorney general, and Frederick J. Griffith, attorney for the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, with whom on the briefs were George Thompson, attorney general, and Gerhardt A. Schueler, attorney for the Wisconsin Department of Agriculture. For the respondent there was a brief by T. L. Tolan, Jr., Samuel J. Recht, and Brady, Tyrrell Bruce, all of Milwaukee, attorneys, and Ellis Arnall, Elliott H. Levitas, and Arnall, Golden Gregory, all of Atlanta, Georgia, of counsel, and oral argument by Mr. Tolan, Mr. Ellis Arnall, and Mr. Levitas.

Judges

PER CURIAM:

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

COFFEE-RICH, INC., Respondent, v. McDOWELL, Director of Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Appellant.

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Justice HEFFERNAN having taken no part in the decision upon this appeal, and the other members of the court being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, Mr. Chief Justice CURRIE, Mr. Justice FAIRCHILD, and Mr. Justice HALLOWS being of the opinion that the judgment should be modified or reversed, and Mr. Justice GORDON, Mr. Justice WILKIE, and Mr. Justice BEILFUSS being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, the judgment appealed from is affirmed under the rule.

Judgment affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

COFFEE-RICH, INC. v. McDOWELL

COFFEE-RICH, INC., Respondent, v. McDOWELL, Director of Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Appellant.

Comments