HEAD, Presiding Justice.
The petition for specific performance in the present case is entirely devoid of any allegations showing the value of the property so as to enable the court to determine that the contract sought to be enforced was fair, just, and equitable, and one that in good conscience should be performed, and the trial judge erred in overruling the general demurrers of the defendants. Coleman v. Woodland Hills Co., 196 Ga. 626 ( 27 S.E.2d 226); Ogletree v. Ingram LeGrand Lumber Co., 207 Ga. 333 (3) ( 69 S.E.2d 480); Almand v. Williams, 208 Ga. 703 ( 69 S.E.2d 271); Ewing v. Paulk, 208 Ga. 722 (2) ( 69 S.E.2d 268); Morgan v. Mitchell, 209 Ga. 348 (2) ( 72 S.E.2d 310); Sikes v. Sims, 212 Ga. 391 (7) ( 93 S.E.2d 6); Seven Fifty, Inc. v. Hunter, 216 Ga. 407 ( 116 S.E.2d 552); Howington v. Juhan, 218 Ga. 748 ( 130 S.E.2d 822). Since the petition should have been dismissed on general demurrer, the other questions made by the record are moot.
Judgment reversed. All the Justices concur.
ARGUED SEPTEMBER 15, 1964 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1964.