Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JOHN H. FAULK, Respondent, v. AWARE, INC., et al., Appellants.

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellants contended that their utterances were privileged and protected under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, as interpreted in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan ( 376 U.S. 254). The Court of Appeals passed upon this question and held that appellants enjoyed no such privilege under the Constitution of the United States.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FAULK v. AWARE
(Oct 1, 1964)