AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of ANDREW ALBERTI, Petitioner, v. THOMAS DICKENS, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the County of New York, et al., Respondents.

Article 78 proceeding unanimously dismissed. The determination sought to be reviewed is an order adjudicating the petitioner guilty of contempt of court for failure to appear before a Grand Jury as a witness in response to a subpoena served upon him. This proceeding does not lie to review such an order. (See Code Crim. Pro., § 619; CPLR 7801; Judiciary Law, § 752; Matter of Grand Jury of County of Kings [ Reardon], 278 App. Div. 206; People v. Brayer, 6 A.D.2d 437.) The order will be reviewable on an appeal which the petitioner has also taken.

Concur — Rabin, J.P., Valente, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF ALBERTI v. DICKENS
(Nov 5, 1964)