Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Henry HANSHAW, Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was charged with robbery, pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-641 and A.R.S. § 13-643. He pleaded not guilty and was duly tried. The evidence established an employee was held at gun point while a store was robbed of thirty dollars. Appellant was identified at trial by the employee on whom appellant had held the gun. Appellant was sentenced to an indeterminate term of from 5 to 10 years.

Appellant filed his notice of appeal in propria persona and counsel was appointed by the trial court pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-161 to handle his appeal. Counsel advised this court by written communication that he had searched the record and the transcript and was unable to find grounds upon which the appeal could be based. This court ordered the appeal be submitted. On examination of the record, including the transcript of testimony, we find no grounds upon which the appeal could be based. State v. Burrell, 96 Ariz. 233, 393 P.2d 921.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. HANSHAW
(Dec 16, 1964)