Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

H.T. MAHONEY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendent-Appellee. Ruby Thelma Loftis PIERCE, etc., Plaintiff-Appellant

ORDER

These appeals came on to be heard and were submitted to the Court on oral arguments, briefs and records.

The issues raised are largely factual in nature and received careful consideration in the District Court. We think there was substantial evidence to support the findings of fact of the District Judge and they are not clearly erroneous.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed for the reasons and upon the ground set forth in the excellent opinion of Chief Judge Robert L. Taylor, reported in 220 F. Supp. 823.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MAHONEY v. UNITED STATES
(Dec 17, 1964)