Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HARRY REVO, Appellant.

Judgment reversed and information dismissed upon the ground that the single film which remains in the record is not obscene within the holdings of the United States Supreme Court in Jacobellis v. Ohio ( 378 U.S. 184); Grove Press v. Gerstein ( 378 U.S. 577); Tralins v. Gerstein ( 378 U.S. 576); Kingsley Pictures Corp. v. Regents ( 360 U.S. 684); Times Film Corp. v. City of Chicago ( 355 U.S. 35); One, Inc., v. Olesen ( 355 U.S. 371), and Manual Enterprises v. Day ( 370 U.S. 478).

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. REVO
(Jan 14, 1965)