Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SMITH v. BANK OF ACWORTH et al.

DUCKWORTH, Chief Justice.

The former suit by this petitioner against this same bank and against his wife raised all questions here involved and resulted in judgment against the petitioner, affirmed by this court in Smith v. Bank of Acworth, 218 Ga. 643 ( 129 S.E.2d 857). Thus is was not error to sustain the pleas in bar and abatement setting forth the record in the above case. Code §§ 110-501, 110-504; Fain v. Hughes, 108 Ga. 537 ( 33 S.E. 1012); Darling Stores Corporation v. Beatus, 199 Ga. 215 ( 33 S.E.2d 701); Gamble v. Gamble, 204 Ga. 82 ( 48 S.E.2d 540).

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED JANUARY 12, 1965 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 4, 1965.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SMITH v. BANK OF ACWORTH
(Feb 4, 1965)