Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Lenton MARTIN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The principal contentions of the appellant in complaining of his conviction and sentence by the court in a jury-waived case deal with defects in the search warrant. We have considered each of these and find that they are without substance. The original warrant was properly signed by the Commissioner. The fact that the copy that was served on the appellant at his home was signed only by a typewritten signature is immaterial. The time which the officers must wait after making their presence known before making a forcible entry — here, one minute — is a circumstance which the trial court must weigh. We find no error in his determination that the execution of the warrant in this case was legal. United States v. West, 2 Cir., 328 F.2d 16.

The judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARTIN v. UNITED STATES
(Feb 19, 1965)