CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS v. DI-NOC CHEMICAL ARTS

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 9774.

Attorney(S)

H. Stephen Madsen, Cleveland, Ohio (Joseph T. Gorman, Kent, Ohio, A. Baron Holmes III, Charleston, S.C., Baker, Hostetler Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, and Hagood, Rivers Young, Charleston, S.C., on brief), for appellant. Don G. Nicholson, Miami, Fla., and Ernest F. Hollings, Charleston, S.C. (Hollings Hawkins, Charleston, S.C., and Nicholson, Howard Brawner, Miami, Fla., on brief), for appellees.

Judges

Albert Vickers Bryan
J. Spencer Bell
Charles Sterling Hutcheson

Acts

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 9774.

Attorney(S)

H. Stephen Madsen, Cleveland, Ohio (Joseph T. Gorman, Kent, Ohio, A. Baron Holmes III, Charleston, S.C., Baker, Hostetler Patterson, Cleveland, Ohio, and Hagood, Rivers Young, Charleston, S.C., on brief), for appellant. Don G. Nicholson, Miami, Fla., and Ernest F. Hollings, Charleston, S.C. (Hollings Hawkins, Charleston, S.C., and Nicholson, Howard Brawner, Miami, Fla., on brief), for appellees.

Judges

Albert Vickers Bryan
J. Spencer Bell
Charles Sterling Hutcheson

Acts

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS CORPORATION and C.P.C. Chemical Plastics Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Appellees, v. DI-NOC CHEMICAL ARTS, INC., Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a foreign corporate defendant's motions to dismiss the action for lack of in personam jurisdiction and for improper venue or, in the alternative, to transfer the case under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1404(a) to the Northern District of Ohio.

Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292(b).

The court's order was based upon the complaint, exhibits attached thereto, and affidavits. We agree that at this stage of the case, the motions were properly denied. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS CORPORATION and C.P.C. Chemical Plastics Corporation, a Florida Corporation, Appellees, v. DI-NOC CHEMICAL ARTS, INC., Appellant.

Comments