Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

NORTHWESTERN OHIO POULTRY ASSN., INC., APPELLEE v. SCHNEIDER, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT.

Taxation — Sales and use taxes — Exceptions — Sale and use of material used in processing for sale — Eggs — Washing, candeling, grading, weighing, oiling, packing, etc., constitutes processing.

Per Curiam.

The operation performed by the appellee for its poultry-farmer members is a processing and preparing to a suitable condition for market and sale, and the purchase and use of the items in question, used and consumed in such operation, which are the basis for the taxes levied by the Board of Tax Appeals, are excepted from taxation by Sections 5739.01 and 5741.01, Revised Code.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of Kroger Grocery Baking Co. v. Glander, Tax Commr., 149 Ohio St. 120, and France Co. v. Evatt, Tax Commr., 143 Ohio St. 455.

Judgment affirmed.

TAFT, C.J., SMITH, MATTHIAS, O'NEILL, HERBERT and BROWN, JJ., concur.

SCHNEIDER, J., not participating.

SMITH, J., of the Six Appellate District, sitting for ZIMMERMAN, J.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

POULTRY ASSN. v. SCHNEIDER
(Mar 31, 1965)