AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WALTER WEEMS, JR., Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 31, 1963 after a jury trial, convicting him of three counts of robbery in the first degree and two counts of assault in the second degree with intent to commit rape, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The evidence warranted the conviction. The defendant made no motion, prior to or at the trial, to suppress the evidence which he now contends was the fruit of an unlawful search and seizure; nor did he object to the introduction of said evidence at the trial. Therefore, his contention on this appeal that the evidence was the fruit of an unlawful search and seizure comes too late to be of any avail ( People v. McCall, 19 A.D.2d 630; People v. La Palia, 21 A.D.2d 811; People v. Friola, 11 N.Y.2d 157). Ughetta, Acting P.J., Christ, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. WEEMS
(Mar 29, 1965)