Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES GRIFFIN, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM: We hold that nothing in Jackson v. Denno ( 378 U.S. 368) or People v. Huntley ( 15 N.Y.2d 72) requires this court to overrule our decision in People v. Nicholson ( 11 N.Y.2d 1067) whose holding and reasoning we now approve. (See People v. Rogers, 15 N.Y.2d 690.) The defendant, therefore, is not now entitled to a hearing before the trial court on the issue of the voluntariness of his confession. Nor has any argument been advanced to justify or warrant any change or modification of our conclusion, in People v. Howard ( 12 N.Y.2d 65, 68-69), that retroactive effect is not to be accorded to decisions of this court respecting right to counsel. (See, also, People v. Rogers, 15 N.Y.2d 690, supra.)

The order appealed from should be affirmed.

Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN concur.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. GRIFFIN
(Apr 22, 1965)