Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BANKS v. HUIET, Commissioner, et al.

HALL, Judge.

In this case the claimant for benefits under the Employment Security Law (Ga. L. 1937, p. 806, as amended 1951, p. 512; Code Ann. § 54-601 et seq.), assigns error on the judgment of the superior court affirming the decision of the board of review that the claimant was disqualified for benefits under Section 5(c) of the Act ( Code Ann. § 54-610(c)) because she had refused to accept suitable work and that the claimant should not be eligible for benefits until she makes a showing of eligibility as provided by Section 4(c) of the Act ( Code Ann. § 54-609(c)) in that that she was available for work, had actively and in good faith sought employment and was actively and in good faith seeking employment and was bona fide in the labor market. The findings as to the facts and the decision of the board of review were supported by evidence. The superior court did not err, therefore, in affirming the decision of the board of review. Code Ann. § 54-619; Dalton Brick c. Co. v. Huiet, 102 Ga. App. 221 ( 115 S.E.2d 748); Huiet v. Wallace, 108 Ga. App. 208 ( 132 S.E.2d 523).

Judgment affirmed. Bell, P. J., and Frankum, J., concur.

SUBMITTED APRIL 7, 1965 — DECIDED APRIL 23, 1965.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BANKS v. HUIET
(Apr 23, 1965)