BRICK v. CITY OF WICHITA, URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF WICHITA

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 44,109

Attorney(S)

William P. Higgins, of Wichita, argued the cause
was on the briefs for the
Ronald H. Rogg, of Wichita, argued the cause
was on the briefs for the appellee, The Urban Renewal Agency of
John Dekker, of Wichita, was on the briefs for the appellee, City of

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 44,109

Attorney(S)

William P. Higgins, of Wichita, argued the cause
was on the briefs for the
Ronald H. Rogg, of Wichita, argued the cause
was on the briefs for the appellee, The Urban Renewal Agency of
John Dekker, of Wichita, was on the briefs for the appellee, City of

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

ELLEN J. BRICK, Indi v. dually, and ELLEN J. BRICK, as Guardian of the Estate and Person of ROBERT J. BRICK, a Minor, both doing business as BRICK'S MEN'S WEAR, Appellants,

Opinion of the court delivered by

SCHROEDER, J.:

Upon consideration of the appeal by this court based upon the record presented in the above entitled matter, the judgment of the lower court is reversed on the ground that it erred in sustaining the appellees' motion for summary judgment. A formal opinion will be filed when prepared.

In view of our decision any application for a stay of proceedings should be addressed to the district court of Sedgwick County, Kansas.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

ELLEN J. BRICK, Indi v. dually, and ELLEN J. BRICK, as Guardian of the Estate and Person of ROBERT J. BRICK, a Minor, both doing business as BRICK'S MEN'S WEAR, Appellants,

Comments