Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GILBERT SWANBERG, Appellant.

Judgment modified to the extent of directing a hearing on the issue of the voluntariness of defendant's statements to the police introduced as a part of the People's case at the trial and, as so modified, affirmed. Case remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for such hearing ( People v. Huntley, 15 N.Y.2d 72). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, VAN VOORHIS, SCILEPPI and BERGAN. Judges FULD and BURKE dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to dismiss the indictment upon the ground, more fully developed in the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division, that the evidence admitted against defendant was obtained as a result of an illegal search and seizure. (See, also, Taylor v. United States, 286 U.S. 1; United States v. Jeffers, 342 U.S. 48; Jones v. United States, 357 U.S. 493; Chapman v. United States, 365 U.S. 610; Ker v. California. 374 U.S. 23, 42 n. 13.)

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SWANBERG
(May 27, 1965)