Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Michael James DECCA, John Anton Slack and Howard Nelson Zinram, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

PER CURIAM:

Only Decca has prosecuted his appeal in this case. The appeals of Slack and Zinram are dismissed for want of prosecution.

The judgment of conviction and sentence of Decca are affirmed. The search complained of on the motion to suppress evidence was a "border search," and as such was legal. See Murgia v. United States, 9 Cir., 285 F.2d 14, cert. denied 366 U.S. 977, 81 S.Ct. 1946, 6 L.Ed.2d 1265, and Mansfield v. United States, 5 Cir., 308 F.2d 221.

The judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DECCA v. UNITED STATES
(Jun 1, 1965)