Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Judges

In the Matter of MARTHA CARDONA, Appellant, v. JAMES M. POWER et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and LOUIS J. LEFKOWITZ, as Attorney-General, Inter

Order affirmed, without costs. (See Matter of Camacho v. Doe, 7 N.Y.2d 762.)

Concur: Judges DYE, VAN VOORHIS, SCILEPPI and BERGAN. Chief Judge DESMOND dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum in which Judges FULD and BURKE concur.

Chief Judge DESMOND (dissenting).

I dissent and vote to reverse and to grant the prayer of the petition. Denial of voting rights to this competent, intelligent and reasonably well-educated and informed native-born American citizen, simply because she is unable to meet New York State's literacy-in-English requirements, is unreasonable and unconstitutionally discriminatory particularly since, by reason of the effective date of the literacy amendment to section 1 of article II of the State Constitution and the exceptions in section 168 of the Election Law, many persons are allowed to vote regardless of literacy.

Order affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF CARDONA v. POWER
(May 27, 1965)