Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THEODORUS BRON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. HARRY WEINTRAUB, ETAL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.HUDSON TRADING CORPORATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

The opinion of the court was delivered

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an amended final judgment entered by the trial court following our decision in Bron v. Weintraub, 42 N.J. 87 (1964). We certified the appeal before the Appellate Division acted upon it.

The judgment under review complies with our mandate entered upon the prior appeal. It is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRON v. WEINTRAUB
(Jun 1, 1965)